Saturday, 18 February 2012

Monument Analysis



The monuments which make up the data set are nine monuments from the south-east section of Pioneer Square, Victoria B.C.. These monuments are located closest to the church, Christ Church Cathedral, and separated from the rest of the square by a path. A link to the map of the study site is posted below. While examining the graves, it was hypothesized that the approximate materials from which the grave monuments were constructed, as well as the design thereof, were indicative of the status of the person or family represented. Using the assumption that stone indicated greater status than composite materials (brick or concrete), and large apparent size indicated greater status than small, the following, ranking was predicted. From highest status to lowest: C.W. Wallace, J.S. Helmcken, Charles Dodd = John Work, David Cameron, and James Murray Yale. The Military monuments were not included due to their impersonal and public nature, as well as their being so far removed, chronologically, from the others. The Lucy Sanders monument was not interpreted as a grave monument, as the inscription made it clear that it was made for the purpose of being a bench. The Cridge grave was not included, as it was not for those whose names were most prominent upon it, but for their children and a sister.

C.W. Wallace

The monument is an obelisk, exact height unknown but much taller than a standing person, and made of stone. It is inscribed on three sides and dedicated to C.W. Wallace and his wife, father, sister, and children. To judge by the dates inscribed, the monument was likely erected in the middle of the nineteenth century.

Unfortunately, no historical information was found concerning this Wallace family. As a result, the status of those upon the monument, particularly that of C.W. Wallace, is unknown.

J.S. Helmcken

The J.S. Helmcken monument is, externally, made of multiple large pieces of stone. Visually, it is a solid block, approximately waist high and more than two paces long. The inscriptions are on the upper surface and it is the tied for being of the largest above ground volume with that of David Cameron. The date of death inscribed is 1920.

J.S. Helmcken likely had high status in the community. He was son in law of the Governor of the Colony of Vancouver Island and significantly involved in politics (Marshall, 2000). He was one of three chosen to discuss terms of confederation in Ottawa. He was, most notably, founding president of the British Columbia Medical Association, president of the board of directors at Royal Hospital (now Royal Jubilee Hospital), and a Chief Trader with the Hudson’s Bay Company (Marshall, 2000). It is likely that he had a higher status in life than that the others included in this set of graves.

Charles Dodd

The Charles Dodd monument is a stone table monument. The top stone slab, over two paces long, is supported at the two ends, about waist high, with the space underneath being left open. The date of death given is 1860.

While alive Charles Dodd was a reasonable successful Employee of the Hudson’s Bay Company, achieving promotion to the position of Chief Factor the day before he died (Smith, 2000). Though Dodd Rock, Dodd Passage, and Dodd Narrows are named after him (Smith, 2000), he was likely of somewhat lower status than John Work.


John Work

The John Work monument is of the same description as that of Charles Dodd. The date of death is 1861.

In life, John Work was a Chief Factor in the Hudson’s Bay Company (Sampson, 2000), though the inscription on the monument only describes him as being of the lower position of Chief Trader. He was a member of the Legislative Council of Vancouver Island and at one point the largest landowner on the island (Sampson, 2000). His status was likely higher than that of Dodd and lower than that of Helmcken.

David Cameron

The David Cameron monument is of the same proportions and shape as that of J.S. Helmcken. The main difference being in that the majority of the monument is comprised of brick, only the inscribed top being stone. The date of death is 1872.

In life, David Cameron was the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Colony of Vancouver Island (Sampson, 2000). He was very much involved in local politics and he had the support of several prominent figures, including J.S. Helmcken and the Governor Douglas. Financially, he was far less successful, declaring bankruptcy the year before he died, losing part of his pension, much of his property, and all of his life insurance policy (Sampson, 2000).

His monument appears to reflect his position well. Being of the largest monuments, similar to that of one of his political associates, it reflects his public standing, while the cheap materials reflect his rather miserable financial situation. He likely had higher status than that of John Work, lower than that of Helmcken, but lower financial status than everyone else in the set.

James Murray Yale

The James Murray Yale monument is now only a portion of a stone slab protruding from the ground.  It is very much the smallest monument in the set. The date of death is 1871.

In life, Yale was a prominent employee of the Hudson’s Bay Company (Lamb, 2000). Though only attaining the position of chief trader, he was an important actor in trade in what is now the lower mainland and had Fort Yale named after him (Lamb, 2000). He had little political presence and, as such, had likely little status in Victoria, where he came for retirement.

Conclusion

Taking historical information into account, the revised list of statuses, from highest to lowest, is as follows: J.S. Helmcken, David Cameron, John Work, Charles Dodd, and James Murray Yale. The Wallace monument, though visually pronounced, was left out of considerations for the revised list of social statuses due to the lack of available historical evidence to factor in. The historical evidence indicates that the design of the monument, particularly the size, is more indicative of the social status of the primary name upon the monument than the materials from which it is made. The materials appear to be more indicative of the financial status of the primary name than of social status. Further research into the financial situations of those to whom the monuments are dedicated would be necessary for any conclusions to be made in that regard.

During the historical research, several accounts of church affiliations were mentioned. In further studies, it would be interesting to research why those who had left Christ Church had proximal monuments with regard to the Church.


References


Lamb, W.K., 2000. Yale, James Murray. [online] Available at: <http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=5330>[Accessed 15 Feb 2012].

Marshall, D.P., 2000. Helmcken, John Sebastian. [online] Available at: <http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=7436
>[Accessed 15 Feb 2012].

Sampson, W.R., 2000. Cameron, David. [online] Available at: <http://www.biographi.ca/EN/EN/009004-119.01-e.php?id_nbr=4873>[Accessed 15 Feb 2012].

Sampson, W.R., 2000. Work, John. [online] Available at: <http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=4783>[Accessed 15 Feb 2012].

Smith, S.A., 2000. Dodd, Charles. [online] Available at: <http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=3874>[Accessed 15 Feb 2012].

Follow This Link to view a map of the monuments.


Relevant Links:

Cameron
Cridge
Dodd
Helmcken
Work
Yale
http://www.biographi.ca/009004-119.01-e.php?&id_nbr=5330                                

Sunday, 12 February 2012

New Post! (or searching for the imaginary)

I didn't read any paper for this one. I tried, but I could not find anything even remotely like I had searched for. I tried tea out of a lucky tin mug, even out of mom cat mug (with a chip), but to no avail. I am forced to conclude that I do not have the necessary access or clever search terms needed to find records of the use of bones of the dead in medicine (excluding the boring sort that happens these days). The thought sparking this search occurred to me when reading about the Vatya burials. The comment about storage allowed for and interesting thought to bloom. I immediately pictured a sealed top being opened and the contents taken out for some use. At this point I drifted off into daydreamy speculation.

I started to invent a culture. This culture I invented saw a separation between life and a soul. The soul was (still is in this place in my head) one thing and life and body were together in another. (This was influenced by Winnie-ther-Pooh, where the name Pooh was taken from a swan when he left as they did not think he would want it anymore). When a person dies, their soul leaves but there is still some life left in the body. The life that was in the flesh has mostly gone, hence it's rotting away, but there is still some left in the bones. That they keep holding together for so long after death is evidence of it. The bodies are thus placed in accessible urns and the flesh is allowed to rot away. The urns are then sealed tight and kept for later use. Periodically, when one gets sick, the medicine practitioner goes to the urn of a relative, for compatibility's sake, and takes a portion of bone. The bone is then ground and used as a component in whatever preparation comes about.

Such a belief system seem pretty reasonable to me, as well as the use of bone in medicine probably being innocuous enough not be a deterrent, so I did some searching for it. First, I went through my head map of places where there is mummification, but nothing there hinted at use of the body as a material. "Post-mortem body use" (including postmortem and post mortem) brought up nothing of much interest, though it did teach me that there is a journal of objects. "Use of human bone in medicine" also brought up nothing outside of modern medicine. Nothing cultural or old. Taking another route, I set the search refinements to:

-Scholarly Journals
-Journal Articles
-Archaeology,

and entered "death medicine." 380 results isn't bad, but I narrowed it a bit further with include human remains and exclude medicine, legal. That brought it down to sixteen, but none of them were of particular use. The following caught my eye, so I gave it a quick read.


by Murail, P and Crubezy, E and Martin, H and Haye, L and Bruzek, J and Giscard, PH andTurbat, T and Erdenebaatar, D"


(The internet is failing me and the birds are of no help whatsoever. They can hardly see beyond their morning seed.)

They think the woman may have been sacrificed, with her tongue and throat removed, for the man and buried with him. Unfortunately, it is only a preliminary report and they conclude that they don't know anything yet, except that the hyoid bone in the offerings box might be the woman's. Rather disappointing.

Back to the relevant bit, after a good bit more research, I decided to give up on the topic for now. I like the idea of looking for something that would be interesting if it existed, for it allows for one's imagination be a resource for things to learn about in reality. Otherwise, one is limited to the narrow field of one's experiences and chance encounter. If all (one) of those that read this encounter anything that is related to the topic, Mongolian burial practices, or anything interesting, the sending word of which would be much appreciated on this side.

Sunday, 5 February 2012

DEATH IN ABUNDANCE - QUICKLY!


THE OSEBERG SHIP BURIAL IN NORWAY

Sæbjørg Walaker Nordeide


This article discusses the Oseberg ship burial, as the lower (and less exciting title) indicates. The Oseberg ship burial is a large ship burial in southern Norway, the mound being approximately 40.5m in diameter and 6.4m high. It is dated to 834 a.d. (Vikings!) through dendrochronology, using the wood from the burial chamber rather than the slightly older ship. Within were good things for taking to the grave, which someone thought might be good for the living as well. The grave was robbed and the two bodies, eighty-ish and fity-ish, were put out of place. If ever I rob a grave, I'll at least be decent enough to leave a record of what it looked like before. Fortunately, the contents of this article have little to do with the contents of the grave. The point at hand is the timeline of the making of the grave. According to Sæbjørg, there is a new theory that the grave was started in the spring and finished in the fall. He disagrees with this and vaguely presents his argument. He makes reference to the contents of the sacrificed animal's stomachs, the plants in the mound and grave, crabapples, the oars, and the composition of the mound to support his argument. Unfortunately, this was very casually written, so solid examples and explanations are hidden within the research of others. His dealing with the other argument is something I found to be rather amusing. He suggests that those who agree with the long burial period theory  were just too excited with a remarkable drawing of the half buried ship that was made a decade or so ago (though I don't see why. It isn't particularly good). He also suggests that the propounder of the argument simply made a mistake and mixed up research from another ship burial and attributed it to this one. While it did not leave me overly satisfied in so far as the nature of the burial, I did enjoy the paper. My favourite  part was:

"This is not a heavy burden, however,
as reading the old publications always is a great pleasure.
The authors seem to have done this exciting excavation
very thorough and properly for their time, and one never
tires of admiring the material excavated from the grave."

His friend (whose name I don't remember) deserves the thanks he gave her for improving his English. 


Here is the drawing:






Nordeide,S.W., 2011.DEATH IN ABUNDANCE - QUICKLY! THE OSEBERG SHIP BURIAL IN NORWAY. Acta Archaeologica, 82(1), p.7-15.